Costs

What the state thinks Zone 0 will cost you

California filed a detailed economic impact statement with the rulemaking package. These are its own numbers, not an estimate from a contractor trying to sell you something.

The headline figures

MeasureEstimate
Average cost to an individual household$960.54
Range for a household$232.77 – $2,686.53
Average cost to a business$968.63
Added one-time cost per new building$2,636
Ongoing annual cost once established$0
Total statewide cost$1.738 billion
Claimed statewide benefit over the decade$55.18 billion

Costs are spread over the first three years for gardening work, and over five years for tree, fence, gate and shed work. The state expects no ongoing costs once Zone 0 is established, on the reasoning that maintaining it costs about what existing defensible space maintenance already costs.

Where the money goes on a new build

The new-construction figure is unusually concrete, because it isolates just two changes:

ItemBefore Zone 0With Zone 0
MulchCedar barkGravel
FencingWoodMetal
Subtotal$1,106$3,742
Difference$2,636

Typical service costs

Board staff gathered quotes for the four categories of work. These are the underlying figures behind the averages above, for a household hiring the work out:

ServiceLowestHighestAverage
Gardening$0$600$284
Gardening plus labour$240$2,220$1,234
Tree maintenance$0$600$354
Fences and gates$75$1,116$131
Fences and gates plus labour$355$2,831$976
Sheds$109$769$380
Sheds plus labour$409$2,769$983

Two caveats the state does not put in the headline. The survey underlying these figures ran from 22 March to 5 April 2023 and drew 1,698 responses. The dollar figures are not inflation-adjusted to the effective date. Treat them as an order of magnitude, not a quote.

How many people are already compliant

The same survey asked whether respondents' properties already met the requirements. Among 1,084 residential respondents, only 18% were compliant overall. By category:

CategoryAlready compliantWill hire labourWill do it themselves
Gardening22.2%26.6%51.2%
Tree maintenance79.2%11.4%9.4%
Fences and gates62.7%20.9%16.3%
Sheds69.4%11.8%18.8%

Gardening is the pinch point by a wide margin, and it is also the category most people intend to handle themselves.

The alternative the Board did not choose

The impact statement evaluated two alternatives alongside the proposal. The more stringent one — prohibiting all vegetation in Zone 0 and requiring immediate replacement of combustible fences and gates — scored a better cost-benefit ratio than the version adopted:

OptionTotal costTotal benefitCost-effectiveness ratio
Less stringent$1.236bn$32.40bn26.21
Adopted$1.737bn$55.40bn31.89
More stringent$2.547bn$98.43bn38.65

The Board took the middle option. Its stated reasoning elsewhere in the package is affordability and implementation practicality rather than pure cost-benefit.

Jobs

The Board projects about 25,148 incremental full-time-equivalent jobs by 2028, against 267 lost in the enterprise sector during the first three years as compliance costs bite. Occupations affected: construction workers, gardeners, arborists, landscapers, and services tailored to compliance including proximity clearing and repair or replacement of vulnerable sheds, fencing and gates.

Ways to reduce what you pay

Source: Economic and Fiscal Impact Statement (STD 399) and supplement, Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, signed 20–21 August 2026, prepared as part of the emergency rulemaking package. Survey conducted 22 March – 5 April 2023, 1,698 responses. Benefit estimates derive from Gollner et al. (2025).